Leadership of Martin Luther

Martin Luther (1483 1546) was a Catholic priest and a theology professor in the late 15th and early 16th century. He was also a central protagonist during the reformation movement In the 16 century, which fathered what Is now cognise as the protestant reformation. Martin Luther has subsequently become one of the most recognized and Influential leaders In the history of the Charlatans Church. Leadership Defined The ecclesial context of Lathers leadership Those who try to fine leadership will attain themselves at a disadvantage due to the limitations of language.To illustrate this disadvantage we scan that a ball is a spherical object that we play with. But depending on the context, a ball can be understand as many disparate things. In football, we play with a ball but it is not spherical. The cheerfulness however, is a spherical ball, but we cannot play with it. We can describe a fun time as having a ball, even though we argon not playing with a ball. We can also go to a ball, even though we may not be having a ball. We will rarely give difficulty in understanding the meaning that Is being expressed In all these situation.The same cannot be said for leadership because the word will Invoke different meanings for different people In different situations (Morehouse, 2010). Rewords Describe the definition of Leadership in Morehouse and Hickman, possibly touch on servant leadership in Hickman as the overall Nature of Lathers leadership. Try to give examples that would support servant leadership or whatsoever leadership he expressed. Rewords Traits and Skills Martin Luther exhibited many of the qualities of what Morehouse describes as trait dervish.The premise of trait leadership Is that certain traits are perceived as more crucial than others In order to lead legally (Morehouse, 2010). These traits are loosely endowed within the leader and cannot be learned. Some of these traits that are central to this this Include Intelligence, self-confidence, object, i ntegrity, and sociability (Morehouse, 2010, p. 19). When comparing Martin Luther with these traits, it is blowsy to see how he naturally exhibited many of them. For example outside his obvious professorship, Martin Luther was a very goodly man.His Ninety-Five Theses objected to several traditional catholic practices, but they were intended as a scholarly argufy with a tone of inquisition. Also, Martin Luther possessed tremendous amounts of self-confidence. He challenged the most powerful religious institution in the history of mankind because he was so confident that he alone was correct and that they were the ones in error. He was eventually excommunicated but he still remained determined to stand for his conviction about catholic dogma. Martin Luther was effective with this method of leadership. HISIntelligence appealed too many while his classically helped him begin his own church by 1526. HIS determination to hold biblical truths as higher then catholic traditions prompted hi m to translate the New Testament in the vernacular of the people by allowed people to have the same access to these biblical truths. Martin Luther also show many of the skills that Morehouse associates with successful leaders. Briefly define traits Rewords Martin Luther traits and how that contributed to his effectiveness (give examples) Rewords Briefly define skills Rewords